@wei_sheng_3139 yes, it is understood. I guess 85% of the feedback on this thread comes down to that feature. So, we need to reconsider. The dev guys will have a look this week. Again, sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers!
Hi all!
We’ve taken your feedback and will update some core pricing features this week. Two changes I would like to highlight, because of the discussion on this thread:
- The possibility to adjust sliced volume on the order page will return (!)
- The reference models on your Hub profile will be fixed
Let me know if any questions remain.
Cheers
Cheers @wei_sheng_3139, happy to hear that
Great new update with the 3 different Marvin sizes!
Can you add an “infiltration” or “sealant” option to the additional fee portion.
That would greatly help us using powder based 3D printers.
I don’t use support material, but I do seal the parts after print and there is a definite cost to this.
The best way to estimate this cost would be a factor times the surface area.
thanks,
Rifle Creek
Hey! you should already be able to select surface as one of the components to base your pricing on!
Hey! Time to print really differs from technology to technology. I do recognise that time to print and labour would be great components to base your price on. Will take this into account!
so what happened to adding additional costs for more than %20 infill, and if support is needed as with most standard extruder type 3D printers? also I dont see my material costs per c3 anymore, what happened to that?
Hello @Filemon
how can a delete a printer?
Jep, that’s a bug :s
Currently you can only put your printers offline. Fix will be deployed late this week or somewhere next. Sorry for that
Does anyone else find judging the cost of the material buy the size of the 3d hubs guy really confusing? is it possible to make it an option of how to show the price. per cm/3 instead of this new system? which with all the options can get really hard to compare.
Cheers,
Bonne
I’m also very confused by why pricimg is now done according to sliced volume rather than object volume. Its way less transparent this way which is a bit disappointing…