phew… i got to it a far sinister high number (4654.4)
Skip to main content
Yes, you would if you used my original equation, which is why I realised it was wrong 
You may actually get there a bit quicker than 68, as I believe 3DHubs only uses a certain number of the most recent reviews, not “all time”, though I could be wrong and I don’t know what that number is.
hehe
i will just take 68 as worst case and it can only go faster
But i dont mind, even thou i have been on the platform since 2014 i still have small things to learn now and then
but i do have the quality somewhat down only i have problem with tiny cylinders they tend to get stringy if to close to each other and they are very brittle
not sure if you know the test objects from treatstock? so things like 2mm in diameter or less is a pain
from the dashboard “Average rating of your services given by the 50 most recent customers.”
so i guess its a rolling 50 review window they base it on
Split this topic on Aug 9, '18