I am genuinely unaware of a system you described, “minimum prices set across all industries.”, off the top of my head other than Venezuela. Not meant to be aggressive/offensive.
@Matterthings José,
My calculations above show a real world operational cost for my hub operation. I believe I’m overpriced even at $.10 per cm3 as the calculations show I can make a profit in equipment and dollars at prices as low as $.05 per cm3.
The calculations from my other post below which I will expand upon here show that the CURRENT BASE PRICE already implemented by 3D Hubs is currently to high and may stifle future free market competition allowing another platform to encroach upon 3D hubs service.
Filament:
Recycled water bottles and other household plastics.
$0.00 per cm3
*It is important to note that the cost of filament could run into negative territory. If someone sets up a recycling center or sets up shop at a recycling center they could theoretically charge a small fee to recycle plastics which would yield them a negative cost per cm3 of filament.
Electric:
Solar or hydro power utilized for a home or another business.
$0.00 per hour (cost is written off for another entity)
Printer Depreciation:
Using modular design and true reprap philosophies the depreciation of a home made printer can easily reach less than 1% per month. Upgrades and new printers could be purchased for very little ($65-$100 using direct from china electronics and 3D printed parts)
Hourly or per CM3 cost of around $.005
3D Hubs Service Fee
Student Discount: Not offered to keep prices lower.
Labor and Profit: If this is a part time or ancillary business venture the printer would operate in an existing shop and simply bring in extra revenue. Very slim margins would be needed.
This scenario, which is not far fetched, would result in a per cm3 cost below THE CURRENT 3D HUBS FORCED BASE PRICE of $.01 per cm3 and $1 per order.
I would be willing to invest some money into a hub who wishes to operate this way and offer sub $.01 per cm3 prints.
NOPE. Free Market Capitalism will ALWAYS be the way to go.
I too have a new-ish hub which seems to stay “under the radar” since the opening > opened for 3 months, had zero orders. I tried a 20% discount offer for the first 10 orders via a post on this forum with no response. After that I cut all my prices in half, just to see if it would attention, still zero orders. I’m a professional engineer using the Ultimaker 2+ for my work so high quality prints are obvious, but somehow it seems pretty hard to get orders (in my area at least). I have to agree with TruNorth, give everybody the option to set their own prices otherwise it will be impossible for new people to make a (tiny) business out of their hub.
OK, I have been watching this thread closely.
Many have said that reviews are the most important thing in customers selecting who to print from. This is dramatically false. Customers will assume prints are the same based on the category of print, and the #1 reason a hub is chosen is it’s location in the search results.
1. Reviews are not easy to see when comparing hubs. They really are not. You can see one review at a time when comparing printers.
2. Reviews do not affect results of where a hub shows up very much. They do not. Perfect reviews do not equal primary placement. In fact, not accepting prints, or customers canceling when you explain prints will not be optimum, affect ranking far more than reviews, as does location.
3. Customers who do get bad prints do not reviews as often. Simple as that. If you know a hub is doing lower quality prints, you will see they have less reviews. There is supporting science that reviews tilt towards the upper end, inaccurately reflecting the quality of the reviewed item.
Right now, bad hubs can easily get ranked first, based solely on number of prints. And ranking in the search is the number one reason folks in my area choose a printer, as I have been surveying them. It also does not help that 3dhubs states the first printer in the search is the best match. (as opposed to suggestd matches or best matches. So saying reviews over price is how customers choose hubs is naive.
In the US, buyer attitude is weighted towards price. (I know, I do this sort of research for a living). Our culture leans towards price as the primary determining factor in making a purchase. If the ranking system worked better, than it would help customers see beyond that, but the 3dhubs reviews do not inform a customer much.
That combined with the fact it shows only one review while comparing, means you can do 100 perfect prints, and one misinformed customer can post a bad review and put the brakes on.
Completely agree. Having seen many hubs, from all over, reviews and the “system” is what truly determines what orders you get. Don’t forget that skimmers (hubs that purposely set the lowest price) end up with inexperienced clients and bad reviews more frequently, being inexpensive isn’t easy. Being critical of lean operations is however.