Go to homepage
23 / 27
Jun 2015

I put my print in a UV chamber after remove the support materials, it came out really good!

Maybe the wall thickness need to be considered for this type of material.

I noticed you printed the part flat, instead of at least 20 degrees (as recommended). Did the peel have any problems that you noticed? The bottom of the part looks very close to the support. Did you have trouble getting it off?

Absolutely. I’ve had a few parts rip and tear. It’s documented in their guidelines what settings to try to use to get the best results.

With the Form1+ you only need a minute or two in the UV (if at all). They sourced a stronger laser in the 1+ from my understanding.

I think you mean 91% IPA. I’ve found that 70% is better with the 1+. The agitation is more important than the sit in the bath.

Are people with flexible resin removing supports BEFORE or AFTER UV curing the part? I’m wondering if it’s easier to do post UV cure. Post cure, it seems the flexible has a tendency to rip because you can’t control the minimum support size below the default (1.8?)? This is unlike the regular polymer where it breaks away more cleanly.

It depends.

Most of the time I remove them after. It’s easier to remove as it’s flexible and I don’t like to have IPA/uncured resin on my cutting tools

It came right off the build platform with no problems and I printed it kind of flat and no problems with peeling I love the flexible material.

Even if it comes out fine, the surface is much better if you oriente your parts. Yes, you lose 1,2ml of resin for support but it’s worth it

So it distorts potential edges during the peel process? The first print with flexible I did was not oriented, and I definitely saw some “snapping” action during the peel.

If you want to see more prints come follow me on instagram sunshinearta51 Cheers Sunshine prototyping