Hi @chriswatton
3DSystems is a foreknown company that produce 3D printers so if you already have the design, you can send it to them to check. Their machines are really good, I have no doubt that your example figure can be made.
The FabPro 1000 that you set your eyes on is screen/projector based not laser. That´s why print speed is quoted by mm/h not mm^3/h.
With that´s said, you need to consider the usage cost of using 3DSystems´ machine and liquid based printers in generals.
-
3DSystems is a close-source company that hold most patents on all 3D printing methods. That´s why half a century after the idea of free-forming is realized we barely have any innovations. Their machines and materials cost more and the ecosystem is closed. If they stop supporting your machine or material, it will be an expensive paperweight.
-
Liquid-based machine require a vented work area and lots of support materials and base. For example if you want to print 1x1x1cm solid cube (1cm^3) at 1cm/h speed. The part will be tilted so that the cross section reduce as the print goes on. Therefore printed vertical height is probably 1.4-1.7mm, adding the base and support it would be ~2cm (2hr) and ~1.5cm^3 total material is used. Some cases extra material can be larger than the part itself. Some liquid is also stick to the outside of printed part and build platform (due to surface tension) that you have to rinse off. Then it cost time to remove the support, UV cure the part. Build platform need to be resurface or replace routinely since you peel the printed base after every print job.
In my opinion liquid based printing have too high running cost (both time and waste material) and only shine in very specific applications. At that price, I would invest in a powder system instead. A Sintratec machine with power recycle is the same initial cost.
As per software for sculpting, TinkerCAD, SketchUp are very easy to use. Blender is better for professional use though.