Go to homepage
5 / 12
May 2016

Hey guys,

I’m on my second nozzle now after cycling through all of Zortrax’s filaments. Mixing polymers will cause the nozzle to block and some polymers do not dissolve in acetone. This is the same for other nozzles. However, systems such as the Ultimaker enable you to control the nozzle temperature to carry out a “cold pull” to clear the nozzle of residue, making it as good as new.

Has anyone tried this with the M200? I’m thinking of trying it during my next clog by timing the cool down phase after cancelling the nozzle heat up. Will share my experiences if I get to do it successfully.

  • created

    May '16
  • last reply

    Jun '16
  • 11

    replies

  • 2.5k

    views

  • 7

    users

That would be great indeed, I already dismissed my first nozzle after using only Zortrax filaments and it’s too bad. I wish I could have tried this first… Good luck and looking forward to your results!

Hi @yowhwui,

very good idea but maybe Zortrax can implement it in the firmware?

Interested to know your findings!

I have not noticed a nozzle blockage yet and have also used all of their filament. Total printing time +/- 350 hours.

(unfortunately I am not printing with the Zortrax at the moment because the extruder-cable is broken. A new one is on its way from Poland though)

Kind regards, Guy

Hi there. Since we work with both, Ultimaker and Zortrax, I see a small problem trying the Atomic method on the Zortrax since the Zortrax’s filament feeder sits on the printhead which is in the way of physically pulling the filament like with the Ultimaker which feeder sits at the back of the machine. I don’t see a way to “Unlock” the feeder system on the Zortrax like on the Ultimaker which would enable one to physically pull the filament out with your hand. But I stand corrected IF any of you could find a way for that.

Hello Nebbian,

I’ve tried this technique yesterday evening on my Zortrax M200 and the filament keeps breaking off before the heated block. Did you try this on the Zortrax or on another printer? It seems to me that the passage before the heated block is smaller than the passage after the heated block. It may be physically impossible to perform this procedure on the M200.