Go to homepage
26 / 30
Dec 2016

FDM type 3D printing is not considered for safe because of the layers and gaps associated with this type of printing there are some good resources online just look for 3d printing and “food safe” Is this for some sort of “body modification” (just guessing as autoclaves are commonly used by piercers and tattooist’s) UV can be used to sterilise but it does break down some plastics such as ABS

Thank you for the input.

My purpose is to 3D print a free form that will come in temporary contact with wounds. Thus it needs to be clinically sterile before use.

Therefore, i would appreciate if someone could give me hints on what printing technology i should use, and what material, in combination with an effective sterilization method.

Hi, I know for a fact that you can use PA2200 which is a nylon powder used on EOS Printers. This material can be sterilised, using various methods. Definitely worth looking into, but you may want to have a look around because if it is going to be in contact with an open wound you will want to make sure the manufacturers have the relevant certificates and conform to standards.

12 days later

We’re currently working with both ABS and PETG for a blood-contacting device that will be sterilized prior to packaging. So, we’re needing both sterilizability and hemocompatibility. Depending on your final application, you may want to look at PETG, it’s compatible with both gamma irradiation and EtO (ethylene oxide) sterilization methods. If you need to go with autoclaving, then you may want to look at nylon as it can handle the higher temperature.

Going forward in my project, autoclave seems like one essential requirement… I will definitely look at the possibility to manufacture using Nylon.

Thank you for the input

We decided t go with Autoclave. That forces us to look into Nylon or other material than can handle autoclave temperature.