If picking between the two hands down Prusa I3 MK2 I own 3 printers and have been printing for 2 years and I will be getting the Pursia as my next printer in an FDM there is nothing more you could want.

Do you have any experience with the MakerGear M2?

It is not a very common one in the maker community. You are getting a much better product and better value with pursia.

Jacob

Is your opinion supposed to overcome the thousands of independent reviews submitted by 3D Hubs around the world, or are you just blatantly spreading your personal bias?

In light of the fact that the MakerGear M2 is THE top ranked machine on 3D Hubs, your statement that Prusa is a “better” product is totally invalid. Considering your utter lack of experience as well as your deliberate avoidance of my question, anything you say at this point is about as useful as a jackhammer in a chemistry lab (as far as I’m concerned).

Thanks for not clarifying!

1 Like

Hello,

This is a increadably hostile response I have a very extensive experience with 3D printing. I am an independent technology specialist in the DC area. I have worked for the Naval Surface Warefare Center and the National Institutes of Health 3D Print exchange have given many talks on the subject as well for high school kids and government officials. I have also designed Makerlabs for schools in the area. In case you didn’t know there is a world out there besides 3D hubs. In case you didn’t know the Pursia MK2 is rated the best Printer by Make: A company that specializes in 3D printing and unlike the people on 3D hubs tests all of the printers not just the ones that they have. Also at a even lower price point then the maker gear you get 4 Color 3D printing a major break threw in the industry at that price point. You also get auto calibrating so all of your prints come out square even if your printer is not square. After doing printing constantly every day for 2 years I can tell you that’s very important as leveling can be a pain esspially with large beds but newbies like this person will especially appreciate it because their prints will have a higher chance of coming out perfect white out them having to mess around. The maker gear offers none of that.

Just to clarify it’s the prusa I3 Mk2 that you mentioned, unless prusia mk2 is a thing I don’t know about. In which case sorry and please ignore this!

Yeah that is what I was discussing sorry if there was confusion I was abbreviating.

This guy has been on the attack on anyone who mentions anything other than worship for the M2.

My opinion for what it is not worth - if you like the M2 and have had a good experience with it then great but no reason to attack everyone with a differing opinion or experience.

He won’t like this then! Aside from “Make” another very respected site had this ranking of their top 20:

Best 3D Printer 2016-2017 #1: Original Prusa i3 MK2

Best 3D Printer 2016-2017 #14: Makergear M2

1 Like

Preach my fellow maker.

Jacob

I spent a lot of time looking at these two printers, ultimately I went with the mk2. The most likely use will be 3d gaming scenery. The review on fatdragongames.com ultimately sold me. I like when products over deliver
 mk2 claims .05 resolution, but reports of printing with great success .025, and he isn’t the only one, appeals to the overclocker in me. Dreams of warhammer quality miniature armies, not really but the possibility of, are nice if not the current reality. I have waited years to get a 3d printer, till the quality, stability, and value/$ ratio got to the present levels. I am hopeful that in two years I will be buying a new one at even greater resolution, speed, volume , and ability than the current m2 even suggests at mk2 pricing or lower.

In the mean time I will build scenery for my games, toys for my kids, and start learning 3d. 20 years ago I’d have bought the kit version, at 50 now though, I’d rather concentrate on learning the use for now
 time enough to learn the build if I discover a need/ability to upgrade components going forward. If I was looking at this from a buisness stand point, the ability to have two running in case one went down would be appealing
 dual extruders would be nice for dissolvable supports but, that is a consideration for the future. My hope now is that the mk2 system will allow implementation of multiple spools of same material on same extruded, so that as one roll ends the next can provide uninterupted material supply. Might require sensor upgrades on the feeder, but problem seems solvable in my naĂŻvetĂ© . It might not be a huge issue, but It would suck to have to have 9 or 16 pieces of scenery/ figures aborted because I ran out of material 80% of the Way through a print.

I have played the tech game on computers for almost 4 decades, Looking for the sweet spot far enough back from the bleeding edge to not waste too much money, but far enough forward to get the functionality I need to be happy. For me at least, I am going with the mk2. I understand that the m2, might be better. Like the top end $1000+ CPU is beter than a $300 CPU when I build a computer. But the demonstrable benefit to my life at this time, in a field I expect to continue developing relatively fast, is minimal.

I did appreciate the conversation I found here. For those like me who are starting out, this is where I landed. If the noise level is a problem, that will mearly determine which room this printer ends up in. Of course with three kids under 9, printer noise is likely the least of my problems there.

john

Hi Marc,

I just recently bought a Prusa i3 Mk2, and have fallen in love with it. I bought the pre-assembled version for $899, and there was very little hassle from taking it out of the box and to getting it running. I am a beginner in 3D printing, as you are, and this printer was very easy for me to understand. I love the amount of filaments to choose from, along with the heated bed and relatively low price. I would recommend getting the pre-assembled version if you aren’t too pressed for cash. It’s much simpler to get running, but if you have enough time and patience, maybe opt for the kit. One caveat to keep in mind is the somewhat long delivery time; mine was about a month and a half. I have never used the Makergear M2 myself, but I certainly like my Prusa. Check out my hub for a few initial prints I have made with it.

-Brendan