Go to homepage
1 / 13
Aug 2016

Not a bad way to do it, but rather than subtract, use the Indent tool. This gives you more options for following the contour of the part.

Another option would be to simply offset all the surfaces that make up the face you want the case to cover. Then, you can thicken the surface to the desired thickness you want to use.

Indent is indeed the easiest in this case, as you can define the air-gap between the ‘phone’ and the ‘case’ in the same feature.

Hi,

The indent tool is perfect for this as most often you want to control the clearance between the two parts.

Say 0.3mm for 3D printing and 0.1mm for injection molding, to take into account distortions, shrinkage and tolerances.

Alternatively use the offset tool which you can then thicken and if the thicken feature does not work, it’s a matter of reworking the surfaces until it does.

When in the end Thicken fails, I offset the initial surface to the inner and outer depth of the new intended part and then connect the two offsets using newly constructed surfaces, often Boundary surfaces, then you knit them together in the end to form a solid. It can be a tedious part of the job.

A simplistic but quick way would be to scale up the initial object to the target distance of the inner and outer surface, then boolean the inside away.

First create the general shape then use the shell command to make it hollow.

one thing you will need to consider is the amount the material will shrink when you cast it you will need to scale everything up in order to account for this.

hope this helps