I was wondering if there is someone who is capable of scanning a chrome (highly reflective) hood ornament? I’m looking for a scanner with similar resolution to the creaform 3D handyscan 700 series (0.03 mm to 0.05 mm accuracy). If you would be able to provide a price for the roughly 6 inch cubed hood ornament that would be fantastic. Thanks in advance.
It is almost impossible to 3d scan a reflective part. The parts need to be coated with i.e talc power, etc If you in need for a scanner have a look at nextengine 3d scanner, one of the cheapest.
A 3D scan is like making a photocopy and it will have errors and will need cleaning.
Unless you object has a lot of round curvy surfaces it is always better and a lot more precise to take the dimensions and re-design it from scratch.
Reflective surfaces can not be scanned, we have had success by coating plastic objects with corn starch and chromed parts with grey primer that we later remove with acetone. (do this only with metal parts, acetone will dissolve plastic).
Have you contacted some local hubs that offer 3d scanning to see if they can help? A lot of hubs do not read the forums. And as pointed out below the item will have to be coated in something non reflective in order to produce a scan which you will want to discuss to ensure it can be easily removed.
Reflective surfaces CAN NOT be scanned, we HAVE HAD SUCCESS by coating plastic objects with corn starch and chromed parts with grey primer that we later remove with acetone. (do this only with metal parts, acetone will dissolve plastic).
Reflection parts are impossible to scan…unless it is treated with a layer of substance that can dull the reflection…like baby power or leak prevention spray…
I am not. If someone asks about scanning a reflective/shiny object and the answer is, “this is impossible”, according to all statistics and research performed that person will over 80% of the time stop reading.
Not one, but two, people responded that reflective objects cannot be scanned. This we all know is complete bunk. The guys making titanium parts for F18 jets 3D scan the parts all day long in order to ensure they are within some ridiculous .001% tolerance. They simply coat the reflective part. (With what I am assuming is $10,000 baby powder or gray primer). It is therefore entirely POSSIBLE and in no way IMPOSSIBLE to scan reflective parts as is later stated by both responders. I take issue with false information being continuously posted to people.
My analogy is very accurate. It is quite impossible to print 3D objects with a roll of 1.75mm diameter ABS filament. I however do so every day by heating the plastic in a hotend. As a general rule, the impossibility is not discussed as the use of a hotend is COMMON PRACTICE and COMMON SENSE. The exact same rule should now apply to 3D scanning reflective objects.
As you would not tell a customer or forum poster:
“it is impossible to print with ABS though I have had success doing so using a hotend”
you should not tell a customer or forum poster:
“it is impossible to scan a reflective object though I have had success using powder or primer.”
I simply take offense to the whole approach which seems to imply you are better than everyone else?
It – is, has, will be – quite – possible, common place, easy – to scan reflective objects. Any information to the contrary is akin to things like the world being flat or printing with ABS being impossible.