Go to homepage
24 / 25
Nov 2016

Same thing here, thou i have also got one order for some clips that where so small i could barely print them. SLA might have helped on that

Just got one big order for a decorative gear thing with about 10 plates for a 200*200 bed. A bigger bed would just have made that more easy as i could print more in one go. Time wise it would have been the same. So far i have yet to reject an order based on the size of the print

physical premises or a shop-front. Dont think that matter much. I do it from home, and i just keep the rooms from the front door to the room where i print clean and tidy. Or at least i would put it in this way that if it was me i would continue in this way until i get enough orders that i can see that i could afford a small office. ie it should at least pay the same as daytime job + the office + some overhead. if the orders never come i dont have a big loss. Maybe i would end up with a expensive 3d printer… and then again i’m a sucker for things i have build myself so i might just build a X2 of the mendel90 i allready have.

3D Hubs will hide you hub if the parts are to big for your printer, so you will never have to decline beacuse of size.

Hi @Asad3D thanks for the confirmation, it did seem to be a logical thing for 3DHubs to do…

However, does this mean I must copy all my materials to my new printer that has a larger build area? My current printer uses the same size filament and can print all the new one can in terms of materials, the only difference is build area and minimum layer height. I did think I’d be able to get away with just adding one new layer height (in each material) for the new printer but I’m thinking now this will exclude me from the larger build area orders who want larger layer heights, so I’ll have to replicate all my materials, at all layer heights for the new printer?

well, I had the same thoughts and therefore bought an Rostock Max V2, approx. 11 months ago.

Since the printer is online I didn’t receive a single order order that was just close to fill the build volume - so for me the investment was not productive.

Interesting @Joerg_4, thanks (although I’m sorry to hear that!). I wonder is that’s because of the limited square build volume? Even in the limited orders I’ve had, I’ve had a couple that may not have fitted the round bed of the Rostock. The largest I’ve had was 220mm x 140mm which (unless I’m mistaken) would be quite a bit outside of the Rostock’s capabilities. The 280mm diameter sounds huge, but the 197mm square limit could be an issue…

No proof, just wondering!

@cobnut

sounds correct, may be this is the reason.

We’ll find out soon, as I am also about ordering a Prusa i3 Mk2 :wink:

Excellent @Joerg_4, it seems like a decent part of the Prusa backlog is just people on here :slight_smile:

Well, you just realized pretty quickly how primitive your “virtual” hub is…

there is very limited things you can do with your hub and there is zero feedback from 3D hubs.

my advice is to get the biggest build volume you can and list all the filament that you have in stock and that you feel you can print reliably.

When will we be able to list precise print volume? Having a list of generic printers is not applicable to everyone, a huge number of 3D Hubs will be using either custom made machines or heavily customised machines, where the build volume might be larger or smaller than the machine on which it is based.

Sorry for the late reply @cobnut - it is recommended that you copy your materials, layer height etc. for your new printer, particularly if it has a larger build volume.

3D Hubs is one of the most flexible platforms I know. They are constantly adding new features and their support is incredible. Please do contact support if you have any questions, I am sure they would love to help you out.

Also you can use the link below to request new features.

http://3dhubs.uservoice.com/ 1