Go to homepage
1 / 7
Jul 2016

The TAZ6 is certainly a worthy competitor. I own both a TAZ6 and Zortrax, and they are both really, really great machines.

Pros for the TAZ include larger build volume, easily hackable/modifiable, fully open source allowing you to run every material on the market, and the ability to change tool heads for running flexible filaments or dual extruders. Cons include the open frame make it difficult to print large ABS parts, and it’s louder than the Zortrax. Of course it isn’t that difficult to build an enclosure which would help solve both issues.

The Zortrax by comparison runs super quiet and with the side covers can usually do a decent job printing larger parts. The print quality on the Zortrax is better than TAZ6 IMO, and that is saying something because the TAZ6 prints are very good indeed. The Zortrax is more limited on material selection, and really cannot be hacked much. You cannot run flexible filaments on the M200 which is a deal-breaker for some. www.z-temp.co has a couple products to mod your M200 to tweak temps and change the hotend to run other filaments (including flexy), but it still doesn’t get you the same openness as the TAZ.

I find that the Zortrax Z-Suite and Lulzbot Cura Edition both give excellent user experience in terms of ease-of-use. This is where I think both companies stand out from the rest. It’s not just about the hardware, having well characterized and defined printing profiles for a range of materials makes a big difference. It beats going through multiple trial-and-error exercises on your own trying to figure it out.

Both printers are terrific, there’s a reason they are constantly top rated in various shootouts. Hard to go wrong either way.